The Impact of Pain Management on Quality of Life


While its use within medical studies is new and its interpretation frequently disputed but health-related quality is becoming recognized as being one of the primary factors to be considered when it comes to the evaluation of medical treatments that include the management of pain. When pain is not treated effectively and relieved, Buy Oxycontin online can have adverse effects on the living quality. This negative effect has been observed to affect every age, type and source of pain which it has been investigated. Analgesics that are effective have been proven to enhance the quality of life by reducing pain. Opioid analgesics and Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (or Coxibs) and a range of adjuvant analgesics that treat neuropathy have been shown to significantly improve quality of life scores of patients with pain. Coxibs offer effective, safe analgesia that is not prone to the problems associated with opioids, benefits that will improve living quality. Recent studies have shown that the COX-2 antagonist, rofecoxib, significantly enhances the quality of life for people suffering from osteoarthritis as well as chronic lower back discomfort. Measurements of quality-of-life, particularly symptoms distress scales, can also be used as a way of distinguishing one agent from another of similar classes. When future research into pharmacotherapeutics it is recommended that quality of life be considered as an outcome as are the usual variables for measuring effectiveness and safety. Particularly, future research of coxibs need to include symptoms distress scores as vital measures of quality of life, in order to determine significant differences between this brand new class of analgesics as well as non-selective anti-inflammatory nonsteroidal drugs.


Pain isn’t just an extremely nascent sensation however, it can affect you in a profoundly negative way on almost all other aspects of our lives which includes mood and the ability to carry out daily duties. According to research conducted by the World Health Organization, individuals who suffer from chronic discomfort are more than four times as likely with no pain to be suffering from anxiety or depression, and are more than two times more likely to be unable to working.Pain is among the most serious health issues that we face in the United States. About fifty percent of Americans visit a doctor with an initial complaint of pain every year and pain is the primary reason for doctor consultations throughout the United States. However, this is not the real size of the issue as a significant proportion of patients with pain don’t consult with a doctor. According to one of the most comprehensive research studies on the subject of pain 18% of those who described their pain as intense or uncontrollable, had not seen any healthcare professional since they believed they could find someone to ease their suffering.The costs of suffering are incredibly high, in both the healthcare system as well as to society as a whole. In addition, people who suffer from pain experience a higher percentage of patients using health care, also their productivity suffers greatly. It is estimated that more than 4 billion working hours are lost each year due to pain. If one takes a moderate average US salary of $30,000 the cost of pain for society is $55 billion in productivity loss for full-time employees alone.While these expenses are huge however, one of the biggest consequences of pain is the impact on living quality. It is generally accepted that pain can be among the primary factors that affect the quality of life. This can be described as the ability of an individual to play a variety of social roles and achieve a certain level of satisfaction within those duties. The research into quality of life is, in general still in its early stages, and the impact of a variety of conditions, including pain, on life quality is only beginning to be recognized. In a growing way, however, the health-related quality is beginning to be considered as one of most significant outcomes that should be measured when evaluating any health-related therapy or intervention.Quality of life is a less obvious indicator than the more commonly evaluated variables of efficacy and safety, however it could be a more reliable indicator of the effectiveness of treatment and could be more important to patients’ satisfaction and the determination to stick to the treatment.

Measuring Quality of Life: The Scales and Beyond

Quality of life is measured in a myriad of ways. An assortment of instruments have been designed to assess and attempt to measure it. A variety of questions must be answered in order to choose the best instrument for a particular situation. In this case it is presumed that we’re referring to health-related quality of living which can be more precise than the general life quality.

Which Is More Applicable, a Disease-Specific or a Generic Instrument?

Special instruments are made to evaluate the how well a person is doing in a specific condition for example, arthritis or cancer. There are numerous instruments that are specific to arthritis for nearly every type of disease such as prostate cancer. For instance there are at a minimum 4 instruments unique to prostate cancer in particular. The drawback of instruments that are specific to prostate cancer is that they make it impossible to compare the results across different disease conditions. Generic instruments are made to assess the quality of life for any condition and across different disease states too. They are advantageous because they permit groups of patients suffering from different diseases to be compared each other. The drawback is that, since they incorporate various kinds of constructs and since they are a broad set of constructs that they’re not able to measure improvements in a specific condition as a result of an intervention. Therefore, they are unable to detect subtle, but significant changes in the quality of life due to a specific treatment.The best illustration of a universal measure of quality of life includes that of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, also known as the SF-36.The the SF-36 is an instrument that measures 36 items of general health that was developed to blend the depth of larger surveys and the simplicity of single-item surveys that are relatively coarse. It can be completed by self or administered via computer or administered by a trained interviewer either in person or via the phone.

What Dimensions of Quality of Life Need to Be Measured?

Quality of life is multidimensional, and the most reliable quality-of life instruments reflect this. There are quality-of-life instruments specific to domains that assess a specific aspect of living quality like the physical functioning or anxieties. However multidomain instruments are usually preferred because any instrument that doesn’t have multiple dimensions can make it difficult to identify the exact nature of a changes. While some instruments include more domains, the majority of acceptable QOL assessment strategies cover many or all of these domains including psychological, physical social and spiritual. The SF-36 contains eight domains that cover physical, role-physical general health, bodily pain well-being, and social function emotional and mental health.

How Much Responder Burden Is Acceptable?

Responder burden is what amount of work the patient has to put in to complete the assessment. The amount of instruments used as well as the number of questions asked in the instruments, as well as the difficulty in conceptualizing the task of responding should be taken into consideration. This is crucial when evaluating the health-related quality of life for those who are suffering due to the severe nature of the disease. While some patients feel grateful for the concern and compassion that is implied by the efforts to ask them about their lives Others may be disabled to complete the task. A lack of compliance can result in incorrect results.

What Are the Administrative Issues That Need to Be Considered?

The majority of quality of life assessments need to be measured at least two intervals, the baseline and at a later time usually after a specific type therapy has been given. Thus, arrangements should be made to ensure the maximum number of patients are able to complete the follow-up examinations. Furthermore, decisions need be taken regarding the necessity of patients to take their own assessments (which could be challenging for patients suffering from extreme pain) or if the use of proxy is allowed. There is general agreement that self-report data is preferred due to the fact that they reduce the chance that proxy participation could unintentionally alter the results, Buy Oxycontin as they allow their personal feelings and beliefs regarding their quality of life to be included in their answers. Instruments that are written in low-literacy levels or with several languages may help reduce the requirement for proxy involvement and also provide the possibility of audiotaping or computerized completion of questionnaires specifically for patients who are restricted in their movement due to extreme pain.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button